Prof. Emeritus Noel M. Swerdlow, a distinguished historian of science and the world’s foremost expert on Ptolemy and Copernicus, died July 24. He was 79.
Swerdlow was famous for his approach to studying the works of ancient scientists, which held that modern scholars should be able to understand the mathematics used by ancient writers—from the Babylonians to Kepler. His translations of and commentary on 16th-century astronomer Copernicus, and other astronomers from antiquity to the Renaissance, are foundational texts still read around the world.
“Swerdlow was fiercely committed to the principle that understanding the history of the exact sciences required an uncompromising commitment to engaging in their detailed technical aspects,” said Adrian Johns, the Allan Grant Maclear Professor of History and Conceptual and Historical Studies of Science at UChicago. “His extensive publications attested to the determination and rigor with which he himself pursued those aspects, in subjects ranging from Babylonian astronomy to the harmony of the spheres.
“With his death the history of science loses one of its greatest scholars—his expertise will be hard indeed for future generations in the field to regain—but also a figure of ardent scholarly conviction."
Born on Sept. 12, 1941 and raised in Los Angeles, Swerdlow received his B.A. in history in 1964 from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a Ph.D. in medieval studies in 1968 from Yale University. Though he began his graduate studies intending to focus on medieval music, he was gradually lured to the study of the history of science, finding both to be similarly mathematical disciplines.
He joined the history department at the University of Chicago as an assistant professor in 1968, and moved to the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics in 1982, where he remained until his retirement in 2010.
“He could take some classical astronomer—who might be a Babylonian who wrote on clay tablets, not just Galileo or Kepler—and dig into the mathematics they were using in order to understand it at the deepest possible level: how they did it and how they were thinking about the measurements,” said Prof. Rich Kron, a longtime colleague of Swerdlow’s in the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics. “He was a class by himself.”
Swerdlow’s research focused on the history of the mathematical and astronomical sciences from antiquity through the 17th century, becoming the world’s leading authority on the technical aspects of Copernicanism and astronomical mathematics in the Renaissance.
Swerdlow wanted not just to translate these ancient scholars’ work, but to bring it into context with the mathematics, instruments, observations and data they would have been using; this fed into a larger movement in the history of science in the past half-century to recreate the tools with which past scientists studied the natural world. When it awarded him a fellowship in 1988, the MacArthur Foundation wrote, “His mastery of the technical thinking of these eras has been invaluable in integrating a highly specialized field into broader historical, scientific, and philosophical discourse.”
His works include a 1973 translation and exploration of Copernicus’s early astronomical work, The Commentariolus; and Mathematical Astronomy in Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus (1984), a two-volume treatise co-written with Otto Neugebauer on mathematics in the works of Copernicus. That work earned him and Neugebauer the Pfizer Prize, the highest book award given by the History of Science Society.
Swerdlow also authored The Babylonian Theory of the Planets (1998). Several colleagues are planning to complete and publish his last work, The Renaissance of Astronomy in the Age of Humanism.
—Prof. Jacqueline Stewart
